The ancient sports eras of Greece and Rome were in many ways similar to the sports that we watch on television in current times. However, there are obvious differences between sports in the two time periods that are worth taking a look at. It is clear that competition has evolved from its basic form into the sports that we know today.
In both time periods, sports could be classified as athletic competition for the entertainment of the viewer. Regardless of whether we are talking about past or present era, the basic concepts of competition and the characteristics that define it have changed very little. The same idea that winner takes all still holds true in most sporting events.
The concept that only free-born Greek citizens are allowed to compete is quite similar to the inequality that we see in modern day athletics. Today, less fortunate children dream of reaching the professional leagues in an attempt to achieve fame and fortune. Unfortunately, only a select few with the necessary skills ever reach it there. This reminds me of a gladiator battle in the ancient times. Underprivileged people compete for the viewing entertainment of the upper class elite. That being said, there are some exceptions to this view of athletic competition. In my opinion, “equality of opportunity to compete” is one of the most critical issues that the sports world faces today.
As far as the athletic part of sports, how would you say it is classified? In your opinion what are the exceptions to the view of athletic competition? I like that you understand what the videos were talking about, I think you should have given more examples.
ReplyDeleteTiyana Young